Baseball playoffs bring it

The first few days of the Major League Baseball playoffs have been intense to say the least. The two wild card games themselves, honestly, were two of the best postseason games you’ll see, right up there with last year’s World Series for the ages. That makes at least nine straight awesome postseason games for MLB, as I count every one of last year’s World Series games as epic.

After seeing starting pitchers knocked around for 48 hours we were finally treating to a commanding performance from one of the game’s aces; why did it have to be against my team? No matter. We hear often how short a five-game series is, especially in baseball, but the fact is it’s five games, not one.

And speaking of several games, today is that awesome day on the baseball calendar in which four playoff games occur, baseball’s answer to the first real day of the NCAA Tournament. I’m leaving work about 2:45 today, cheating me out of about 40 minutes of gametime from the 12 hours or so of baseball set to go tomorrow. Yeah, I feel a little cheated but I suppose that’s what DVRs are for.

Tragedy in Las Vegas

I hold no illusions of grandeur, that people actually read this blog to find news or that there are legions of readers out there beside themselves just itching to know what I think about a particular topic. I mostly write this blog for myself: one to practice writing and two to perhaps one day look back myself and see what I had to say about topics X, Y, or Z.

With that in mind, it would be foolish to have a blog and say nothing about the recent events in Las Vegas, Nevada. I have nothing, really, to add to the dialogue other than what any normal person would think: just an unthinkable tragedy you’re glad you had no part in. I realize that hundreds of people were affected by this horror, and of course one feels awful just thinking about those situations.

About the only constructive thing I can say about the event is that, well, it’s not changing how I feel about large-scale live music events and it’s certainly not changing how I feel about Las Vegas.

Still going to concerts, still going to Vegas.

That’s it.

Purple Line problems

There has much debate recently in my local paper concerning the infamous Purple Line Metro, a proposed 16-mile stretch of railway cutting through suburban Maryland. Last Sunday there was a front-page story about a number of Marylanders who stand to lose their businesses and livelihoods as the developers (that’s you and me, taxpayer!) take parcels of land through eminent domain. Previous articles have discussed the disruption to the natural environment as well. (You know what they say about politics and bedfellows.) On the other side, yesterday there was an opinion piece defending the line (sort of), and promoting public-private partnerships in general. (When I hear the phrase “public-private partnership” I reach for my wallet.) Guess what? The author was one of the partners.

This is one of those cases in which people who have some stake in a project (i.e. they stand to benefit personally or lose personally) are the ones who happen to be for or against said project. These should not be the areas in which collective action takes place. Too many winners and losers for the government to be taking sides. This is like Poly Sci 101, but I suppose every once in a while we could use a refresher.

And for a fuller version of how I feel about the Purple Line, head here: http://littlesongs.net/

Hugh Hefner, 1926-2017

hef3

A common refrain when an elderly person dies is he’s in a better place now.

No one’s saying that about Hugh Hefner.

The iconic magazine editor and cultural crusader passed away Wednesday at his home—the most famous private residence in America—at the age of 91. This is final proof that no one lives forever.

It’s not as though we didn’t see this one coming. There had been what I’d call “radio silence” on Hefner’s health for some time and, let’s face it, The Man was 91 years old.

Ninety-one very well-lived years.

The things people will call to mind most quickly are the beautiful women. The parties. The pajamas. A baronial lifestyle with bacchanalian excess. Kings and queens and presidents and potentates have had far less.

But there’s the other side of Hugh Hefner as well. The side who really did read the articles. Articles about personal freedom, first and foremost, and an openness among grownups and governments. Playboy was and remains at the forefront of civil rights, gay marriage, marijuana legalization, and a host of other issues once taboo that are now mainstream. One might add sex in that category as well.

Pictures of naked women were the hook. Anyone could have done that though. The genius was to associate sex with upward mobility. Those pictures weren’t just sold in paper wrappers behind counters anymore. They were viewed by people who wore tuxedos and listened to Henry Mancini. “It’s a lifestyle available to most, in one form or another. It has to do with celebrating life with a little style. It has to do with reinventing yourself and becoming the person you really want to be. Life is much more rewarding that way.”

Those were the words sent to me in the only correspondence I ever had with the man I long considered my greatest idol and influence. Yeah, it’s basically a form letter, I’m sure, sent to many a fan over the years, but it does sum up the philosophy. Hugh Hefner didn’t have horns or want to corrupt your children as was suggested by his detractors through the decades. He wanted everyone to enjoy life and be happy. That’s something sadly lacking from this world.

Over the past 36 hours there has been wall-to-wall coverage of Hefner’s death on all major news stations. At one point yesterday four of the top five articles on CNN’s website were about Hugh Hefner. That’s pretty good. I’d thought long ago he’d sort of outkicked the coverage, that his death wouldn’t be as celebrated as it would have been 20 or 30 years ago. Nope. It was like the passing of a head of state, as celebrity and regular joe well-wishers proclaimed condolences. Nary a tweeter yesterday didn’t have a nice thing to say about Hef.

Hugh Hefner holds two world records recognized by the folks at Guinness, ones that I don’t see falling any time soon. One: longest editorship of a magazine. That one ended Wednesday night at nearly 64 years. Second was the world’s largest personal scrapbook. Something close to 3,000 volumes last I heard. In addition to putting out a magazine read by millions Mr. Hefner has kept a private collection of his own materials that take up something like an entire wing of his famous abode. (Haven’t heard what the new owner’s doing with those yet.) No one was ever able to say he or she knew Hefner better than he knew himself; the man was the ultimate chronicler of self, and some day those mansion walls are going to talk.

And the man who came closer than anyone to eternal life just gets a little closer.

Taking a stand

The most engrossing story in sports the past few days, of course, has been the great controversy surrounding the national anthem and how NFL players would observe said ceremony. This, of course, coming on the heels of President Trump’s declaration last Friday night of his opinion regarding such. In case you’ve been on Mars since last week, some choice words from the president and something about firing those who wouldn’t stand.

Unlike most people in the world, I like Donald Trump. I’ve liked him for 30 years. But this just wasn’t cool. I understand the sentiment, of course, but I also understand why someone wouldn’t want to stand for the anthem. We all have a right to protest. I get it. Not something I would do, but okay. But I don’t see the inherent evil in Trump’s comment. It was a juvenile grab at a cheap applause line from someone who obviously knew his audience. Classy? Hardly. Earth shaking? Hardly. Though everyone else seems to think it was Lexington, Concord, Pearl Harbor, and Rosa Parks all rolled into one.

What it may have done, perhaps, is actually unify the country for once. Trump unify the country? Tune in next week when pigs fly and Hell freezes over.

Sometimes TV will surprise you


Last night I found myself with two fine offerings on the television screen, shows about which I had doubts a week or so ago. Turns out that Ken Burns’s The Vietnam War is fantastic, the first episode I reviewed last week being an anomaly in an otherwise stellar series.

And speaking of things turning out well… surprisingly well… how about those Redskins? In primetime no less! Now there’s an anomaly.

Keep it up, everybody.

Dulles Plane Pull

‘Round these parts tomorrow is something called the Dulles Plane Pull. It’s exactly what it sounds like: people at Dulles Airport trying to pull airplanes with ropes or rubber bands or some such thing.

There’s also a 5K race in which I’m involved. The race course is right on the runway. Yeah, they stop the planes for a few minutes and let idiots like me run around out there. I’m a little out of practice and have no intention of winning or anything like that; I just want to finish. Because if you don’t finish the race by a certain time you’re just finished.

I think your signal to be done is when you hear the engines starting up again.

VA gubernatorial race… zzzzzzzz

A story last Sunday in my local paper (that would be The Washington Post) describes the milquetoast campaigns put forth by the two major-party candidates for governor of Virginia this year.

No mud slinging, no name calling, no bizarre clips on TMZ.

Just, you know, the issues, and like, you know, snoozefest.

How disappointing.

Vietnam, as told by Ken Burns

Last night PBS aired the first episode of Ken Burns’s new documentary: The Vietnam War. I’ve been looking forward to this series for several years. As I’ve said many times before, no Republican likes the films of Ken Burns more than I do.

Obviously Ken is taking on a challenging subject with Vietnam. Spoiler alert: the Vietnam war is controversial. There are people around today with very strong feelings about the war on both sides. It’s not as though there are many people around today pushing Prohibition or keeping Jackie Robinson out of baseball, subjects of Ken’s more recent works. Vietnam though? It’s going to be tough to keep bias out of this one.

Minutes into the film we see it’s not just a historic retelling. I don’t think there’s any question we’re going to look like the bad guys through much of the film. Interestingly, too, Ken’s approach this time around is a bit different as well. He’s taken to interspersing “current” clips (from the ’60s) with the historical info and the iconic “Ken Burns effect” style of filmmaking. The period covered in Episode One is 1858-1961 (mostly a history of French settlement and subjugation), though again there are cuts to action from the late ’60s, the period one usually imagines with any mention of the war.

This was the first war Americans saw every night on television.

And 50 years later, we get to see it again. Every night this week. Check your local listings.

Littles doing little things

Twice in the past week and a half my music has been featured on the Tony Kornheiser Show podcast, a feat for which I have received much adulation and praise. I’ve done many things in life, but really I am most proud of two… the above mentioned, of course, and my 2000 triumph in an online trivia contest sponsored by Turner Classic Movies, subject: Frank Sinatra.

I’ve never been more happy or complimented more extravagantly over two more insignificant achievements.

#itsthelittlethings