Trumping all the rest

I figure most Donald Trump-types are good for about 15 minutes of fame following the announcements of their presidential bids. You make a splash, the media fawns, then you get out of the pool.

But Donald Trump himself in 2015? This guy just keeps on going.

I’m not going to comment one iota on Trump’s politics. I’m not even sure what they are, really. I’m not sure he knows what they are either.

Who cares. The guy’s a breath of fresh air among the measured windbags of the political class.

You know why Donald Trump is going to step in it again and again over the next few months? He doesn’t think or act like a politician.

Thank God.

His latest flap? The one with the local hook that the national media hasn’t even found yet? He’s annoyed some local conservation group around here because the golf course he owns a few miles down the road from my house had to cut down a few trees from the swamp that existed previously.

Ha!

And you love the guy a little more.

Honestly I doubt Donald Trump could ever really get elected president. Then again, if you’d asked me a few years ago whether a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama would ever get elected president, I’d have said the same thing.

Show is but a month away

One of the things I’m most looking forward to this summer is an upcoming show I have at the Goodwill Theatre in Johnson City, mere minutes from where I grew up. On Monday, August 17, I’ll be joined by Dan Miller, Dan Fabricius, and Jeff Guevin for an evening of jazz standards and a few original compositions of mine. We’ll be recording some tunes that afternoon, then recording the show as well for a future release. Head to www.goodwilltheatre.net for tickets and further information.

Oh, and I’ll remind you a few more times as well.

Called it

Hate to say I told you so…

Wait a minute, I love to say I told you so, and here it is again.

Baseball’s all-star game?

Knocked it out of the park.

Seriously, was that not the best Home Run Derby you ever saw? Looks as though they’ve got the formula down now, and I’d say for next year don’t change a God damn thing.

The game itself was no anti-climactic disappointment either. Relatively close game? Three home runs? NL pitchers ringing up 15 strikeouts? Uh huh.

Everyone who dismissed the All-Star Game over the past week or so can now sit down and you know what. The couple of days that are often a hole in the sports calendar produced, well…

a home run.

I like it the way it is

As a Republican and a libertarian I’m used to defending unpopular views. I never thought I’d have to do so for our national pastime’s “Mid-Summer Classic.”

It seems I can’t open a newspaper or turn on any device these days without hearing someone, professional or amateur, complain about the Major League Baseball All-Star Game. Good God, you’d think the game was being hosted by Bill Cosby draped in a Confederate flag.

At the risk of sounding merely adversarial, I like the game and its accompanying Home Run Derby the way they are. I couldn’t imagine summer without them, and I look forward to introducing a new generation (well, at least one representative of that generation) to them tonight and tomorrow evening.

Play ball!

This film was worth the wait

The other night I watched a documentary that had been in my Netflix queue since 2013: Smiling Through the Apocalypse. Alternately subtitled “Esquire in the ’60s” and “How Howard Hayes rocked journalism,” the film highlights Esquire magazine during the 1960s and how its editor, Howard Hayes, well, rocked journalism during that decade.

The film is written and directed by Tom Hayes, son of the famous editor who had little time for family and fatherhood while running a major magazine. Young Hayes resists making the predictable documentary of the famous man’s dark side and instead glorifies the old man, and if the film has any flaws it’s that the pendulum tilts a bit too much in this direction. The movie’s a self-congratulatory puff piece, but cool in a Mad Men meets Jack Kerouac meets The Rolling Stones sort of way. To say the film has a pro-Esquire (really pro-Hayes) bias is like saying the pope has a bit of a Catholic bias, but as one who likes the product, I digress.

Smiling Through the Apocalypse was the name given to Esquire’s compendium of the 1960s, a nod to the cheerful disposition those at the top may have taken during tumultuous times. No fiddling while Rome burned, but genuine cheeriness of those who celebrate life and man at his best. Truth is, the magazine did show the darker side of Camelot and that which followed, and gave its readers through Mailer, Talese, and Wolfe the real America which was neither Apocalyptic nor grinning unnecessarily.

I recommend Smiling Through the Apocalypse. It’s a period piece, and one with great journalistic star power (like the magazine itself). It’s also a story about family, work, personal relationships, and the bonds that bring them together. While smiling, no doubt.

Politics and television

I always figured that one day our 21st century sensibilities would kick in and The Dukes of Hazzard would be res non grata on TV. I never thought the same would be true for The Cosby Show.

Yeah, up until now I’ve been a tacit Bill Cosby apologist (it just couldn’t be true, right?), but now I really do think of Bill Cosby differently.

Great. Our generation’s one TV dad that wasn’t a complete moron… down the drain.

Hitting all the high notes

This is how you spend July Fourth weekend if you live in the suburbs and have a one-year-old…

Friday night: celebrate all things great about America with pizza and s’mores.

(Silently curse neighbors with their fireworks going waaaaayyy to late into the evening.)

Saturday: doughnuts from a place called Duck Donuts. I was a Duck Donuts virgin until this weekend. Seriously, it’s worth driving past several other doughnut shops on your way there, including Starbucks, Dunkin’ Donuts, and the other two Starbucks.

Followed by…

Morning baseball. Seriously. Eleven a.m. start time? I’m in on that.

Gig 2-5 at a winery… outdoors in a rainstorm. Can’t win ’em all I guess.

Franklin and I played outside a bit in the evening when it stopped raining but he was asleep long before any fireworks began.

Fireworks on TV. I thought the lead up to the fireworks this year on “A Capitol Fourth” was pretty terrible, but passable with the sound off.

(Silently curse neighbors with their fireworks going waaaaayyy to late into the evening.)

Sunday: not a damn thing.

Perfect.

Happy Fourth

flag

One of my more favored holidays is that which we celebrate tomorrow: the Fourth of July.

Or, if you work for the government, you celebrate it today, because no holiday is complete without a day off from Uncle Sam.

Truth be told, those government workers aren’t too far off in their celebrations. Actually, they’re no farther off than we are, for as we know the day our nascent congress voted for independence was July 2, not July 4. In a well-known letter from 239 years ago today, future President John Adams assured his wife that July 2 would become a great American holiday. Well, he was only off by a day.

However you celebrate the Fourth please do so responsibly. And while you’re at it, check out the Declaration of Independence for crying out loud. You may be surprised to find the language not only blustery and idealistic, but at times crude and menacing too!

Amen, brothers! Your movement lives on today.

“Diversity” agents are never satisfied

The article referenced here is about a month old, but I’ve got a baby and am therefore behind the times.

CNN headline from May 26, 2015: “Fashion, plus-size modeling and race: When ‘diversity’ isn’t so diverse.” Yeah, the folks who clamor for “regular”-looking people (read: overweight) to be featured in magazine ads are now upset that more, let’s say people of color are not used in said ads.

What we have here is proof of two things: 1.) Our opponents will never be satisfied; and 2.) Even with 2015 politically-correct sensibilities (is that an oxy moron?) in place, it still comes down to appearances and physical characteristics, doesn’t it?

Speech codes come to Berkeley

This one’s about a week old and therefore ancient history in media years, so most of the world has already forgotten about the hubbub surrounding the University of California’s system-wide policing of racist and sexist “microagressions” in writing and speech.

But I haven’t.

The real creation of this monster actually goes back to this past January, when UC’s president Janet Napolitano (remember her?) sent a letter to her deans and department chairs inviting them to attend seminars “to foster informed conversation about the best way to build and nurture a productive academic climate.”

Yup.

You see, phrases such as America is a melting pot, America is the land of opportunity, and I believe the most qualified person should get the job, can no longer be tolerated at that beacon of free speech, the University of California’s flagship school at Berkeley or any of its subsidiaries. To be fair, these phrases aren’t technically illegal, just, you know, frowned upon because “brief, subtle verbal or non-verbal exchanges that send denigrating messages to the recipient because of his or her group membership (such as race, gender, age or socio-economic status).”

Non-verbal? Are you kidding m—oh God, I’ve said too much.

So-called microaggressions, the argument goes, can lead to “hostile learning environment[s],” which politically-correct types view as legally actionable.

Eep.

But don’t worry, this won’t play any role in grades or tenure or hiring or firing or anything like that, because, you know… Everyone can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough.

Whoops.

[Editor’s note: The only thing that offends me about that last sentence is the grammatical error!]